By Our Correspondent
Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has expressed surprise over reports that Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), listed him as a witness in his ongoing trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Wike told journalists that he was puzzled by his inclusion and questioned Kanu’s motives. He said he had no connection to the IPOB leader or the case.
If you see Nnamdi Kanu, ask him why he listed me as a witness. I do not know what I am supposed to testify about. People just wake up and include your name in things you know nothing about, Wike said.
Kanu is facing terrorism-related charges and recently filed a motion seeking 90 days to prepare his defence. In the application, he listed several high-profile Nigerians, including Wike, Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, former Chief of Army Staff Tukur Buratai, and former Ebonyi State Governor Dave Umahi, as potential witnesses.
According to Kanu’s legal team, the witnesses are intended to provide testimony regarding incidents linked to the government’s handling of protests and security operations in the South-East, particularly the alleged Obigbo Massacre following the EndSARS demonstrations in 2020.
Legal analysts say the inclusion of high-profile figures could complicate the trial, raising questions about whether serving or former government officials can be compelled to appear in court.
Wike, who was Governor of Rivers State during the period in question, stated that he had no role in Kanu’s legal troubles and denied any personal involvement in actions against IPOB members.
As governor, I acted in line with my oath of office to maintain law and order. I have no personal issue with Nnamdi Kanu. I am not sure what this is all about, he said.
The trial is expected to continue in the coming weeks, with the court set to decide whether to grant Kanu’s request for additional time to prepare his witnesses.
This development adds another layer of attention to the long-running case, as Kanu and his legal team continue to challenge the federal government’s handling of the matter.
