By Our Correspondent
Nigeria’s Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, is facing widespread criticism after reports emerged that he travelled to the 2025 Asia Pacific Cities Summit and Mayors Forum in Dubai with his two sons listed as part of his official delegation.
The summit, which gathered global city leaders to discuss urban sustainability and development, saw Wike represent the Federal Capital Territory. However, what was expected to be a routine ministerial engagement quickly stirred controversy at home after Nigerians questioned why his children were included in a government delegation.
The revelation has sparked a heated debate on social media and across political circles, with many Nigerians accusing the minister of nepotism and misuse of public funds. Critics argue that the inclusion of his sons, who hold no known official positions within the FCT administration, undermines principles of accountability and transparency in public service.
One social media user wrote that this is a clear example of how politicians blur the lines between personal privilege and public duty. At a time when Nigerians are grappling with economic hardship, such an act is seen as insensitive and poorly timed. Others questioned whether public funds were used to sponsor the trip, demanding clarification from the FCT Administration on the nature of the sons’ participation at the summit.
This is not the first time Wike has faced scrutiny over alleged favoritism and excesses in office. Earlier reports accused him of allocating large tracts of Abuja land to family members, including his eldest son, allegations he has not publicly addressed. Observers note that the Dubai incident further fuels public perception that the minister often acts with little regard for optics or accountability. Critics argue that such actions undermine President Bola Tinubu’s broader promise of fiscal discipline and good governance.
Political analyst Dele Momodu previously remarked that Wike’s influence within the administration often gives the impression that Nigeria has two presidents, highlighting growing unease about the minister’s perceived autonomy and power.
As of press time, neither Wike nor the Federal Capital Territory Administration had issued an official statement clarifying the purpose of his sons’ inclusion in the delegation or whether the trip was funded with public resources. Analysts suggest that unless a clear explanation is provided, the controversy could further erode public trust in the FCT Administration and deepen concerns about how government officials handle official trips and representation abroad.
The backlash underscores a broader sentiment among Nigerians who feel alienated by what they see as a political elite detached from the realities of ordinary citizens. While international engagements can yield benefits for governance and urban development, critics insist that public officials must uphold transparency, merit, and prudence in all official dealings.
Until Wike addresses the controversy directly, questions will linger over whether the Dubai summit was an opportunity for official diplomacy or another example of political privilege at public expense.
